Day 7: A crystal mask, a thunderstorm and Murphy’s Law

The penultimate day of rehearsal: it is becoming increasingly clear what the viewer can expect. Today we saw the last artists of the second semifinal. Let’s take a closer look at the rehearsals:

AUSTRALIA: Whatever you think of Sheldon Riley, he sings like no other. During his emotional ballad he wears the white suit with the enormous drag of feathers. He wears his crystal mask for most of the act, but it goes off. It can’t be difficult for Australia to make it to the final.

CYPRUS: For the first time in years, Cyprus is singing (partially) in Greek again. Andromache and her dancers stand in a kind of shell as they sing the song. We have to admit that we would describe Andromache’s vocals as ‘not bad’. If is that a recommendation….?

IRELAND: Ireland falls into the ‘how nice’ category. Brooke’s vocals are certainly not bad, neither is the act. However, you may wonder if this is the song with which Ireland will finally reach the final again. We cannot rule out the possibility that it will not work.

NORTH MACEDONIA: Perhaps Andrea had hoped for greater success. She was not happy with her first rehearsal. The song comes across as screaming; a hoarseness that suits Kaliopi (2012 and 2016) but not Andrea.

ESTONIA: Unfortunately, Stefan can’t count on the 12 points from Armenia, because the country where his roots lie is performing in the other semifinal. The many movements he makes do have an effect on Stefan’s voice, but somehow it doesn’t seem to matter for the entry. It is a happy song that can easily go through to the final.

ROMANIA: The Romanians made some minor changes to the act, making it even better and slicker. Furthermore, it seemed as if WRS had changed the melody of the chorus a little bit here and there. In any case, a spectacular show is in store for Romania.

POLAND: The ballad of Polen starts very calmly with Ochman alone on stage. Halfway through, when the song becomes a little less quiet, the aforementioned dancers (forest nymphs?) come on stage. We see that a heavy thunderstorm erupts on the stage. Finally a strong contender for Poland agiain.

MONTENEGRO: A ballad in which not much happens in 3 minutes. The advantage is that not much can go wrong. We had already mentioned the blue dress that Vladana is wearing. Behind her a circle that most resembles the fluff ball of a dandelion. It is not sure whether it stands out enough to go to the final.

BELGIUM: The Belgians have a strong singer with a gospel-like power ballad in Jérémie Makiese. He will definitely get points for that. Fortunately, because the act he shows looks a bit stiff and doesn’t really do justice to the song and singer.

SWEDEN: Murphy’s Law strikes. If one thing goes wrong, everything immediately goes wrong. Problems with the sound, problems with the technique and a falling cameraman meant that she was only able to do one whole runthrough. Cornelia did manage to show how professional she is, by showing a good rehearsal even with all that trouble.

CZECH REPUBLIC: The act with lots of light and nice graphics fits very well with the Czech entry. In that respect it is a unity. The vocals, however, leave a lot to be desired. That could cost them their heads if it has to be clear who will go to the final.

Related news

Eurovision 2026

EBU warning Israel after voting campaign

📷EBU/Corinne Cumming The EBU warning to Israel concerns broadcaster KAN and its promotion of “Michelle” by Noam Bettan. The song is Israel’s Eurovision 2026 entry. The warning followed promotional videos in which viewers were urged to use all ten votes for Israel. Eurovision director Martin Green said the EBU contacted the delegation soon after the videos appeared. The campaign was then removed from the relevant platforms. According to the EBU, such a direct voting appeal does not fit the contest rules. It also goes against the spirit of fair competition. KAN said the campaign was the artist’s own initiative. The broadcaster also denied that illegal funding was involved. Rule changes after Israel debate The EBU warning to Israel is notable because it comes in the first year under stricter Eurovision rules. These changes followed the debate after Eurovision 2025. That year, Israel’s Yuval Raphael finished second overall and won the public vote. Several broadcasters and commentators then raised questions about promotion, voting transparency and organised support. As a result, the EBU changed parts of the voting system. The maximum number of votes per payment method was reduced from 20 to 10. Professional juries also returned to the semi-finals. In addition, the EBU tightened its rules on disproportionate promotion. This is especially relevant when governments or third parties are involved. Israel’s Eurovision entries have also faced repeated scrutiny over lyrics. In 2024, Eden Golan’s original song “October Rain” was rejected by the EBU. The lyrics were seen as too political for the contest. A second version, “Dance Forever”, was also not accepted in its first form. Israel eventually competed with the revised song “Hurricane”. This year, Israel’s 2026 entry was approved only after extra checks and reported minor changes. Taken together, the warning, the rule changes and the lyric interventions show a clear pattern. Israel remains part of Eurovision, and KAN denies deliberate rule-breaking. Still, Israel again seems to test how far the rules go. Time after time, the country appears to search for the edges of what is allowed.           

Read More »
Eurovision 2026
Martijn

EBU warning Israel after voting campaign

📷EBU/Corinne Cumming The EBU warning to Israel concerns broadcaster KAN and its promotion of “Michelle” by Noam Bettan. The song is Israel’s Eurovision 2026 entry. The warning followed promotional videos in which viewers were urged to use all ten votes for Israel. Eurovision director Martin Green said the EBU contacted the delegation soon after the videos appeared. The campaign was then removed from the relevant platforms. According to the EBU, such a direct voting appeal does not fit the contest rules. It also goes against the spirit of fair competition. KAN said the campaign was the artist’s own initiative. The broadcaster also denied that illegal funding was involved. Rule changes after Israel debate The EBU warning to Israel is notable because it comes in the first year under stricter Eurovision rules. These changes followed the debate after Eurovision 2025. That year, Israel’s Yuval Raphael finished second overall and won the public vote. Several broadcasters and commentators then raised questions about promotion, voting transparency and organised support. As a result, the EBU changed parts of the voting system. The maximum number of votes per payment method was reduced from 20 to 10. Professional juries also returned to the semi-finals. In addition, the EBU tightened its rules on disproportionate promotion. This is especially relevant when governments or third parties are involved. Israel’s Eurovision entries have also faced repeated scrutiny over lyrics. In 2024, Eden Golan’s original song “October Rain” was rejected by the EBU. The lyrics were seen as too political for the contest. A second version, “Dance Forever”, was also not accepted in its first form. Israel eventually competed with the revised song “Hurricane”. This year, Israel’s 2026 entry was approved only after extra checks and reported minor changes. Taken together, the warning, the rule changes and the lyric interventions show a clear pattern. Israel remains part of Eurovision, and KAN denies deliberate rule-breaking. Still, Israel again seems to test how far the rules go. Time after time, the country appears to search for the edges of what is allowed.           

Read More »
Follow Us: